God, I love how your bunch hinges on one thing and lose the entire context. I said, in so many words, not to fight the force and allow it to a point until the position to switch. I was explaining the balanced rotation from receiving to recover positioning and I also explained where it is initiated as well. They're the same!
You guys are unbelievable!
More than likely, the guy who made that video has a good amount of fight experience under his belt and can make an informed analysis that is easily conveyed. That's the difference between that and those who do much of the pontificating and theorizing that goes on in this forum.
Yep, my point exactly.
As i said in my 1st post, its a nicely balnced clip beteeen theory and application. But youre right, the maker of the clip understands fighting (boxing in this case) and can explain the theories from a practical point of view.
Hendriks response showing "classical WC" turning too much shows, to me, an unrealistic understanding of fighting.
Mate, im 100% with you. I guess what really gets me angry with him is that when people like myself ask for more practical explanations of what he is saying he just repeats himself with the inference we dont know "real" WCI pretty much feel the same way. I wish nothing but success for the guy, but to talk so much and so in depth about a way which is supposedly superior or more complete in a sense, and then to show absolutely nothing to prove it...it's just too hard to believe.
Totally agree again. Im not needing to see him fight but some work with some partners (he had people there recently) would suffice. But all there is is talk and maybe a slap of a dummy or similar.Nearly in every other case on this forum we see any demonstration video responded to with constant requests of "why not post a real fight?" In this case however, it's at a point where even a solid example of YK snake engine or YK wing chun power generation on an inanimate object would suffice.
Funny enough, his response to my post is the same asa ever..... talk talk talk with not a lot of substance.
Either he cant or wont speak at our crude level
That is a how videos ARE SUPPOSE to be done.
To borrow the DBMA mantra:
See it taught, See it fought.
You can NOT separate theory from practice.
If you can't show it fought, then it shouldn't be taught.
I have found that you don't need 10's of minutes to describe an MA "theory", not unless you are trying to over complicate it to make it seem more than it really is.
That video should be the template for all others.
Psalms 144:1
Praise be my Lord my Rock,
He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !
If One don't know the proper way of yjkym , one don't even know basic Wck. one must be joking to use Wck for fighting as some always claim.
My video address the basic common denominator of Wck , never get out of the boundary of Wck teaching. If one can't even do that forget about using Wck in fighting. One don't even know Wck basic .
Wck is not boxing with Wck technics.
How can one judge Wck fighting when one is clueless even on how to stand properly in yjkym?
Instead of posting boxing clip which got nothing to do with Wck . why don't you post your lineage Wck best instruction clip here and see is it fighting proper? Put you sifu, sigung clips up. Even better put your own clip up to show us your wck for fighting.
And let everyone here see and compare and see how realistic or applicable your clips for wck in fighting? Instead of playing back sit driver.
Talk is cheap.
Last edited by Hendrik; 08-16-2013 at 08:13 AM.
Talk is cheap.
Oh the irony of it all !!
Psalms 144:1
Praise be my Lord my Rock,
He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !