Actually after reading his FAQ, I must admit I have a good a priori on him. It's just an a priori that stemed from a couple of words, of course, therefore it has not much value, but even though, he says very clever and humble things in it...
Some examples I quote:
"in my opinion, one hour serious training is better than 10 hours' casual training." (not very commercial, but rather honest)
"Qi Gong can be used as self-defense. But, that should be martial art Qi Gong. Zhineng Qi Gong is for health, not for self-defence." (he makes things clear, not like all the people making you believe you'll drop opponents without ever touching them)
"(on the question "Is internal better than external??") I do not think so. Different styles have different advantages, and everything depends on individual practice." (now that's quite honest for a guy teaching only internal styles...many others instead lenghtily discuss on how internal arts are so superior to external ones).
"(on the question of "Can I study other styles along internal style"):I think it is possible. Because the internal style can become the complementary training to external style. And, there are some students in my school still take some other training such as Shaolin, Karate, Judo at the same time. I told them, you can take any training when you will you can make a progress". (You can say whatever you want, but that guys at least sounds tolerant and lucid about his teaching and other's as well).
There are many more, but I do not want to sound like I'm doing him some advertising. I never heard of that guy before. He seems to have had quality teachers though, but having prestigious teachers do not necessarily make you prestigious students (too bad for me LOL). All I want to say is that at least he gives a very good and humble image over the net, and that if these words are not his, he definitely did a fine job chosing them. I have seldom seen internal teachers say things like "internal is not necessarily better than external" or "you can get good things from other styles" when they are fakes...on the contrary, they usually try to seduce you with mystic mumbo jumbo and powers, while at the same time cussing the "unrefined external arts".
So I definitely give this guy the benefit of the doubt, and unless some posters here go to his school and truly expose a fake, I'll keep thinking so.
Wuwei, I don't mean to be rude but you just come out of nowhere in here and start cussing this man as a first post. Usually it's not a good sign. You wouldn't be trying to stain him would you?
All you have is hearsay from former students. I have sometimes heard former students of very good teachers cuss them...but after a little analysis, it was often a question of ego, of plain lie (it's always easier to put the blame on someone else than us), something that went wrong for personnal reasons between them, or most of the time people saying "he doesn't possess what people say he does" or things along "he wouldn't teach me some stuffs" (these persons, of course, never even a second wondered if maybe they were just not worthy of beeing taught these things they ardently desired)...All I can say is why don't you go to his school and see for your self?
In the martial world, hands speak louder than words. It's really the best way to make your own idea about him, and if he indeed is a fake, then you can just turn the page and spend your time finding a quality teacher. All the time spent doing so is never lost...