..........
..........
Last edited by pmosiun; 08-28-2010 at 11:55 AM.
you hooked me
Ok,
1) Good movie
2) not historically correct (from my understanding)
3) Western boxing is great, fighters are tough and would beat many wing chun guys! (Sorry but its true)
4) Ip Man won in the end (in the film!)
5) Asians are sometimes easily dominated by Westerners in many respects. (because they play our game instead of thier own) Chi Sau, push hands, ufc etc
If you want to be good, foget about Ip Man, respect yes, understand your history yes, and train you ass off in a constructive and illegient way.
paul
www.moifa.co.uk
Boxing has weight classes. The boxer has sparring partners, training preparation etc. Boxer runs, jumps rope etc. Boxing is a sport. Ip Man is clearly much smaller, and only had "kung fu" preparation. Not used to gloves coming at him, nothing to really engage. His arsenal was limited as shown by the incident where they questioned and made illegal his using kicking. So the hero had so many things making him such an underdog. Now, imagine if Ip man ran 5 miles a day, did cardio, sparred, and weighed within 20 pounds of that guy! priceless..
Moy Yat Kung Fu - Martial Intelligence
The Flow is relentless like a raging ocean with crashing waves devasting anything in its path.
"Kick Like Thunder, Strike Like Lighting, Fist Hard as Stones."
"Wing Chun flows around overwhelming force and finds openings with its constant flow of forward energy."
"Always Attack, Be Aggressive always Attack first, Be Relentless. Continue with out ceasing. Flow Like Water, Move like the wind, Attack Like Fire. Consume and overwhelm your Adversary until he is No More"
A U.S. release...finally.New Trailer And Poster For US Release Of 'Ip Man 2'
The Ip Man movies have generated a ton of buzz over the last few years, with good reason, as they're some of the best martial arts films in recent memory. Following the eponymous Ip Man, the founder of Wing Chun, who famously instructed Bruce Lee, the second installment, Ip Man 2 will hit US theaters for a limited release on January 28, 2011. In accordance, a new trailer and poster have been released.
Here's a summary:
After escaping the Japanese occupation of his hometown of Foshan, China, Ip Man and his family have arrived in Hong Kong, which is living under the iron fist of British colonial rule. Ip wants to support his family by opening up a martial arts academy to teach his unique Wing Chun style. But a corrupt cabal of Hong Kong martial arts masters, led by Hung Chun-nam, refuses to allow Ip to teach until he proves himself – and prove himself he does, in an intense series of fights against the masters showcasing a dazzling variety of martial arts styles, culminating in a highly anticipated brawl between Ip and Hung atop a rickety table. But even after gaining the respect of the masters, Ip's troubles are far from over. Hong Kong under British rule is a world of corruption, and when a Western-style boxer named Taylor "Twister" Milos comes to town to entertain the British upper-class, and insults both Chinese martial arts and the native citizens in a horrifically violent way, Ip must step up and fight for the honor of both his kung fu and the Chinese people. Forced by honor to enter a brutal "King of the Ring" boxing match against Twister, it's East versus West in an amazing, knock-down drag-out fight to the finish.
If nothing else Ip Man 2 is worth a look to see martial arts badasses Donnie Yen and Samo Hung (who have both been in too many amazing films to name here) engage in an epic battle of legends. That alone promises to be worth the price of admission.
Gene Ching
Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
Author of Shaolin Trips
Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart
poster looks dope.
Opens in U.S. theaters this Friday, but only a limited release. I'm sure S.F. will have it. Not sure about where else yet.Enter the Teacher to the Dragon of Martial Arts Films
By DENNIS LIM
Published: January 21, 2011
NEARLY four decades after his death, Bruce Lee remains one of the most potent symbols of Hong Kong cinema’s golden age. The original crossover martial artist, a local child star turned celebrated creator of Jeet Kune Do, the art of the intercepting fist, Lee made only a handful of films after his international breakthrough. (He died in 1973 at the age of 32.) But kung fu classics like “Fist of Fury” (1972) and “Enter the Dragon” (1973) are the stuff of countless homages and imitations, and Lee’s life and career have been chronicled in dozens of books and films. While the Hong Kong martial arts drama has long been in decline, it’s only fitting that the latest stirrings of a revival are connected to Lee: the most popular kung fu screen hero of the moment is none other than Lee’s mentor, Ip Man.
Born in the southern Chinese city Foshan, Ip Man (1893-1972) settled in Hong Kong after the Communist takeover of 1949 and devoted his life to the practice and popularization of the Wing Chun fighting style, known for its explosive, close-range strikes. Until recently his cinematic afterlife has been confined to brief appearances in films about his most famous student, but a growing wave of Ip Man movies has elevated him to a folk hero in his own right.
First came Wilson Yip’s “Ip Man” (2008), a biopic set in the 1930s, before and during the Japanese occupation, with the action star Donnie Yen in the title role. (A big hit in Asia, it received a brief theatrical run in the United States last year.) Mr. Yen and Mr. Yip reteamed — along with the illustrious fight choreographer Sammo Hung — for “Ip Man 2,” which covers its hero’s years in 1950s Hong Kong, as he contends with rival instructors and thuggish British colonialists. The top-grossing local film in Hong Kong last year, “Ip Man 2,” opens Friday in New York and Los Angeles.
Rushed into production on the heels of the first “Ip Man,” “The Legend Is Born — Ip Man,” directed by Herman Yau, is a prequel of sorts, focused on a teenage Ip. The filmmakers behind “Ip Man” and “Ip Man 2,” in taking on bite-size portions of their protagonist’s life, are leaving themselves open to a continuing franchise.
And Wong Kar-wai, perhaps the most revered and singular of Hong Kong auteurs, is finally shooting the Ip Man project that he has been developing for years. Titled “The Grandmasters” and featuring Mr. Wong’s regular collaborator Tony Leung in the lead role, it remains, as tends to be the case with Mr. Wong, shrouded in secrecy. (The fights are being choreographed by Yuen Wo-ping, known for his work on the “Matrix” trilogy and “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.”)
Mr. Yen said in an e-mail interview that the films have sparked interest in Ip Man’s biography and philosophy. “People now see Ip Man as a legendary master of his time,” Mr. Yen said, adding that the movies have done “a good job promoting Wing Chun to the world.”
Many a kung fu film is predicated on a contrast of fighting techniques — the saying “Northern leg, southern fist” broadly sums up the regional differences. To prepare for the role, Mr. Yen, who described himself as a mixed martial artist, lost 10 pounds and boned up on Wing Chun, a characteristic of which, he said, is “conquering the unyielding with the yielding.”
He spent hours late into the night practicing with a wooden dummy. Character research was inseparable from mastery of the discipline. “Using your bare fists with this traditional equipment is the best way to experience the character and his martial arts legacy,” Mr. Yen said.
Less a flesh-and-blood character than an allegorical abstraction, Mr. Yen and Mr. Yip’s Ip Man continues the long tradition of the kung fu master hero, exemplified by the much mythologized 19th-century physician and martial artist Wong Fei-hung (incarnated on screen by, among others, Jackie Chan and Jet Li). He also echoes the Bruce Lee persona in being an emblem of racial pride.
Born in San Francisco and raised in Hong Kong, Lee appeared on American television in the late ’60s (on “The Green Hornet” and “Batman”). But it was his Hong Kong productions of the early ’70s that ignited his global superstardom. There was often a chauvinistic edge to Lee’s self-appointed role of kung fu ambassador: his films were designed as showcases of his skill, and by extension, of the superiority of Chinese martial arts. (Still, he was hardly a purist, inventing his own camera-friendly style and often incorporating non-Chinese elements.) “Fist of Fury,” set in the early 20th century in the Shanghai International Settlement, pits Lee against a variety of colonialist adversaries; “Return of the Dragon” builds to a gladiatorial showdown with Chuck Norris in the Roman Colosseum.
Mr. Yen’s Ip Man is likewise compelled to demonstrate the dominance of his technique, facing down northern interlopers in “Ip Man” and a rival master of the Hung Ga school (played by Mr. Hung) in “Ip Man 2.” The main villains are caricatured foreigners: a glowering Japanese general and karate expert in the first film and a barbaric British boxing champion in the second.
The Ip Man films speak to the tricky economics and politics of post-hand-over Hong Kong cinema. For many the return of the British colony to Chinese rule in 1997 brought down the curtain on what was once one of the world’s scrappiest and most vibrant film industries.
The scholar David Bordwell points out in the updated edition of his landmark study “Planet Hong Kong” that the decline was already under way before 1997, thanks to a combination of factors that included piracy, a defection of talent, the iron grip of Hollywood and the ascendance of other Asian cinemas. The upshot: In the past decade Hong Kong cinema, an export business even in its prime, has grown more dependent on the financing power and large audiences of mainland China.
Li Cheuk-to, a film critic and the artistic director of the Hong Kong International Film Festival, had a twofold explanation for the nationalist bent of the Ip Man films, which are Hong Kong-China co-productions. “On one hand it is an homage to, or an exploitation of, the Bruce Lee films,” Mr. Li said by e-mail. “On the other hand it is a calculated move to please the audience, especially the Chinese in the mainland market, where anti-Japanese and xenophobic sentiments are stronger than in Hong Kong.”
Mr. Yip, the director of the films, acknowledged that their patriotic tenor might partly account for their appeal. Ip Man, he said, “survived a difficult period in his life, as did China, and still became one of the great masters in martial arts.”
But politics is ultimately secondary. As martial-arts throwdowns, the Ip Man movies live or die on the strength of their fight scenes, and the response from the kung fu cognoscenti has been mostly favorable. Mr. Li characterized the fights as a continuation of the “hard-hitting, dynamic yet intricate style” that Mr. Yip, Mr. Yen and Mr. Hung developed in their first collaboration, the crime thriller “Kill Zone” (2005).
In Hollywood brawls, digitally abetted staccato edits and shaky, off-center perspectives increasingly create a visceral impression of tumult at the expense of coherence (as in the Bourne and Batman movies). But even at their most kinetic the best Hong Kong movies generally ensure that a viewer is able to follow the action in an action sequence. Even in an age of computer-generated imagery, Mr. Li said, the priorities of Hong Kong genre cinema remain “intricate action choreography and a shot breakdown that shows each movement clearly.”
This visual legibility is a point of honor for the martial arts performer, a confirmation of his bona fides. Bruce Lee was often filmed in shots that framed him head to toe, the better to show off his moves. “New technologies should really only be used to enhance the visual quality, not to manipulate the entire fight choreography,” Mr. Yen said. He noted with pride that an especially demanding scene in “Ip Man 2,” in which he and Mr. Hung square off on a teetering table surrounded by upturned benches, took eight days to film.
For the kung fun fan sheer physical ability remains the greatest special effect. “To do an action as simple as standing on a wooden pole takes great skill,” Mr. Yip said. “No amount of technology can recreate that, even today.”
Gene Ching
Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
Author of Shaolin Trips
Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart
Ip Man 2Debating whether or not I'll go to see it on the big screen. I've got STRIKEFORCE: Diaz vs Cyborg this Saturday - not sure if I can sneak in a movie that I've already seen in there too. I suppose it depends on where exactly it is showing for me. I know, I know, I should go out and support. We all should.will open in New York, Los Angeles, Denver, Seattle, San Francisco/San Jose, Honolulu, Portland, Dallas and Austin on January 28, with more markets to follow.
Gene Ching
Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
Author of Shaolin Trips
Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart
I hope it eventually plays in San Diego. I'd like to see it on the big screen first. I wouldn't expect it to become a big hit, but maybe it will play in one of the art house theaters.
If it gains enough attention, it *may* give some impetus for a possible future Donnie Yen/Tony Jaa onscreen pairing.
@Jimbo - I think Tony Jaa is done for a spell - haven't heard anything on him since this: tony jaa calls it quits. Nevertheless, we'll have something on ONG BAK 3 next week. Stay tuned.'Ip Man 2: Legend of the Grandmaster' review
Amy Biancolli, Hearst Movie Writer
Friday, January 28, 2011
Ip Man 2: Legend of the Grandmaster
ALERT VIEWER Action. Directed by Wilson Ip. Starring Donnie Yen. (R. 108 minutes. At Bay Area theaters.)
Well Go USA/Variance Films
If there is one cardinal rule of action movies, it's this: Any sneering bad guy who informs the hero that he's "making a big mistake" is, at that very moment, making an exceptionally big one. That's doubly true when our hero is Ip Man (Donnie Yen), the hallowed Wing Chun instructor of Hong Kong and the transcendently awesome butt-kicker of "Ip Man 2: Legend of the Grandmaster."
Wing Chun is a form of kung fu that combines offense and defense in fleet, close maneuvers. Ip Man (also spelled Yip Man) was a revered practitioner whose many illustrious students included Bruce Lee. You wouldn't know it from the movies, but the real Ip Man used opium and worked as a cop, and never went mano-a-mano with a kung-fu fighting Japanese general.
That was in the first "Ip Man," released in 2008 and directed, like this one, by Wilson Yip. It was a magnificent, ridiculous, audaciously overwrought story, which included a delightful bit in which he uses a feather duster to beat the snot out of a sword-wielding bully.
He can use just about anything to beat the snot out of just about anyone, but he never revels in this ability. He's a man of modesty. Slim, mild-mannered and committed to the Confucian principles of the Chinese martial arts, Master Ip approaches his opponents with an otherworldly calm that explodes in a flurry of darting kicks and punches when circumstances require.
Whereas "Ip Man" was set in mainland China during the late 1930s, "Ip Man 2" takes place in Hong Kong after his arrival there with wife and son. Instead of sadistic Japanese occupiers, we now have cartoonishly slimy British expats and a clubby old group of rival kung fu masters. They're annoying and imperious - Ip Man's martial arts school is muscling in on their turf, darn it - but they're certainly a limber group of seniors.
Yen brings the same coiled, quiet power he brought to "Ip Man," carrying himself with grace until the time comes to pulverize his opponents. The fight scenes are super-crunchy fun, relying more on tightly choreographed moves and judicious enhancements than all-out airborne CGI. It honors the law of gravity, more or less. If the movie packs a weaker punch than the original, it has less to do with the action sequences than the script (by Edmond Wong, son of Raymond, who wrote the first), a flimsy affair with subpar villains. Try as they might, smarmy British twits and one overly muscled goon just don't measure up.
-- Advisory: Violence.
I feel ya - it will be fun to see IM2 on the big screen. I hope everyone here can go out and support it.
Gene Ching
Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
Author of Shaolin Trips
Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart
Gene:
Looks like Tony Jaa is back:
http://www.tony-jaa.net/index.php/topic,58.0html
why does it say 07/01/2011 were these pictures taken in the future?
I agree with you there totally. The attitude you are referring to ruined an otherwise great film, as far as I am concerned.
So, we have the same Ip Man who destroyed around 10 Japanese Karate black belts, at the SAME TIME, almost not surviving his challenge with a mere boxer? LOL! A boxer who had previously somehow managed to kill a Hung Gar master (without the use of a machine gun)?????
We are talking about one of the best known kung fu masters of the last century and not some forum member who practiced couple of years of Wing Chun is some Mcdojo!!!
Maybe someone involved in the production of the movie was an Anglophile.....
I don't know, but IMHO on some level the movie can be seen to be disrespectful as regards the TCMAs.
It was a great movie that was ruined by the producers paying too much "respect" to an art such as boxing, to the point that they may be seen as disrespecting the all of the TCMAs and TJMAs.
Could the movie makers' attitude be the result of the recently discovered secret traditional Western boxing technique of skipping rope?????
Last edited by Hardwork108; 01-29-2011 at 06:54 AM.
i saw at it last night and didnt care for it
I am pork boy, the breakfast monkey.
left leg: mild bruising. right leg: charley horse
handsomerest member of KFM forum hands down