Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 236

Thread: Forget the History, Forget the Politics

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Forget the History, Forget the Politics

    Wing Chun kung fu is going to become little more than a footnote in the annals of martial arts if it doesn't get past the obsession many people have with history, lineage, politics, families, wing chun "concepts" somehow making wing chun a superior art, etc...

    and get down to the basics:

    Is your martial art training (and wing chun training in particular) developing you into an efficient fighter, if you ever have to fight?

    Or if you choose to spar or compete with other people?

    Or if you choose to pass it on by teaching others, will you be capable of passing on fight efficiency to your students?

    Are you being realistic in the training methods? Strengthening? Conditioning? Cardio? Mental focus? Breathing technique and efficiency under stress? Street awareness?

    Are you paying attention to the kinds of fighting principles, strategies, and techniques that many other people are using these days?

    Mixtures of boxing, kickboxing, Thai boxing, BJJ, wrestling, sambo, judo, san da, etc. ???

    Because if your main concern focuses around wing chun history (or supposed history), the politics of lineage, ranks, and positions within and amoung families...

    you're contributing to the footnote syndrome I alluded to earlier.


    Comments?
    Last edited by Ultimatewingchun; 11-14-2008 at 07:24 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Henderson, NV
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by Ultimatewingchun View Post
    Wing Chun kung fu is going to become little more than a footnote in the annals of martial arts
    That has more do with the system itself than the bickering or infighting over lineage. Don't get me wrong, I love Wing Chun, but it's not marketable, it's not flashy, and because of that the general public won't pay attention. You want to know something? That's fine with me, because look what happened to TKD.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Quote Originally Posted by Almost A Ghost View Post
    That has more do with the system itself than the bickering or infighting over lineage. Don't get me wrong, I love Wing Chun, but it's not marketable, it's not flashy, and because of that the general public won't pay attention. You want to know something? That's fine with me, because look what happened to TKD.
    Boxing is not flashy, neither is judo and certainly not BJJ.
    Yet...

    Fact is, if someone came on the scene with WC skills and started putting the kaibosh on people it would get everyone's attention.
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    125
    I very new to WC (TWC). A month or so ago I was on the Bullshido forums trying to figure out what martial art to try. I was amazed at how much bashing there was in relation to Wing Chun - both internally (lineage vs. lineage) and externally (mma vs. Wing Chun). I quickly left due to the overall negative "feel" of those forums. More people there to bash than to help.

    Still that did not deter me from trying Wing Chun. So far I love it. My Sifu does not bash the different lineages and hasn't really mentioned lineages since my "intro" day. My Sifu has trained in a bunch of MA in his past, so maybe this makes him more open minded. I dont know.

    Before I started in WC, I had a friend at work who trains in some form of Mantis take a look at the school I was planning on attending. He told me to beware of the lineage wars. Knowing beforehand that they existed, I have pretty much tried to avoid paying real attention to them.

    Besides, I don't know enough about my own lineage to make any argument one way or the other. I just try and stay out of the way. I am just happy to be training in a MA that I am enjoying.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Quote Originally Posted by golgo View Post
    I very new to WC (TWC). A month or so ago I was on the Bullshido forums trying to figure out what martial art to try. I was amazed at how much bashing there was in relation to Wing Chun - both internally (lineage vs. lineage) and externally (mma vs. Wing Chun). I quickly left due to the overall negative "feel" of those forums. More people there to bash than to help.

    Still that did not deter me from trying Wing Chun. So far I love it. My Sifu does not bash the different lineages and hasn't really mentioned lineages since my "intro" day. My Sifu has trained in a bunch of MA in his past, so maybe this makes him more open minded. I dont know.

    Before I started in WC, I had a friend at work who trains in some form of Mantis take a look at the school I was planning on attending. He told me to beware of the lineage wars. Knowing beforehand that they existed, I have pretty much tried to avoid paying real attention to them.

    Besides, I don't know enough about my own lineage to make any argument one way or the other. I just try and stay out of the way. I am just happy to be training in a MA that I am enjoying.
    Out of curiosity, if you saw so much WC bashing, why did you decide on WC after all?
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  6. #6
    There is a lack of extrinsic evidence that Wing Chun works.

    Many other arts have verifiable means by which to assess their effectiveness, such as boxing, judo, BJJ etc.

    Irrespective of functional modes of training, the downfall of Wing Chun will be the failure of Wing Chun men to;

    a) pressure test;
    b) adapt; and
    c) evolve.

    The assessment as to whether history or politics has any bearing on an individuals ability to use Wing Chun should be based on one question;

    How does it improve me as a fighter?
    "From a psychological point of view, demons represent the universal equivalents of the dark, cruel, animal depths of the mind. When we as martial artists are preparing ourselves to overcome our fear of domination at the hands of an opponent, we must go deep within our inner being and allow the darkest parts of ourselves to be revealed. In order to battle the monsters in an abyss, we must sometimes unleash the demon within" http://darkwingchun.wordpress.com/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    Out of curiosity, if you saw so much WC bashing, why did you decide on WC after all?
    OK, get ready for a long winded response:
    I guess it was a number of things.

    A) I am attracted to Kung Fu styles

    B) I wasn't really picking a style per-se, but picking a school. Out of the schools in my immediate area there were 3 that seemed to be mainly geared towards adults - Krav Maga, Bujinkan (sp?) ninjitsu, and WC. After reading about the WC school, there were many aspects that drew me in:

    The training methods seemed to be flexible and varied. If you wanted to do MMA style training (through a WC filter) they had that, if you wanted grappling classes they had that, if you wanted to mainly stick to low-contact you could do that, if you wanted to do full-contact sparring they had that too. I liked the fact that the school seemed very flexible to personal goals. I am personally very unsure of myself and did not want a place where i would have to be thrown into full-contact sparring right away. I haven't been in a fight in about 15 years, and therefore am not in any hurry to get in the ring. But I like the fact that if I changed my mind, those options were there. The ninjitsu school had some philosophy that was like "we don't spar so no one gets horribly maimed or killed." Ok.

    Lastly, from what I had read and heard, the Sifu at the school a) was very well respected in the WC community (or at least TWC), b) seemed to have a reputation as a very capable fighter, c) he had trained in what seemed to be a dozen different MA and d) I just liked the guy when we met. I thought to myself "I want to train with this guy."

    So far I have not regretted that decision.

    The fact that it was WC or TWC played very little in the decision making process. I knew that I didnt want to do BJJ or any style that involves grappling. Not that I dont think it is important or valuable. I just prefer striking styles.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by golgo View Post
    I very new to WC (TWC). A month or so ago I was on the Bullshido forums trying to figure out what martial art to try. I was amazed at how much bashing there was in relation to Wing Chun - both internally (lineage vs. lineage) and externally (mma vs. Wing Chun). I quickly left due to the overall negative "feel" of those forums. More people there to bash than to help.
    I'm right there with ya. When I first discovered Bullshido, I was excited about it. I liked the idea of a community devoted to debunking fakes and frauds, but it didn't take more than a few minutes to see that amongst the Bullshido-people, frauds & fakes are defined as "anyone who doesn't do muy thai & BJJ & compete in CAGE FIGHTS!"

    That site isn't about martial arts at all, it's about MMA. Period. And if you aren't down with the MMA...You. Are. A. F@G. I quickly learned how gay I was for liking Wing Chun.

    I mentioned this stuff in a different thread here, and someone was kind enough to point out the "irony of talkin' sh!t about people talkin' sh!t". Yeah...ok, but really...Bullshido is one big "you're-a-f@g"-flamewar and I don't think it's unreasonable on a discussion forum to discuss it.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Ultimatewingchun View Post
    Wing Chun kung fu is going to become little more than a footnote in the annals of martial arts if it doesn't get past the obsession many people have with history, lineage, politics, families, wing chun "concepts" somehow making wing chun a superior art, etc...
    Victor,

    Good post. Unfortunately it's probably going to require a lot of work and good will. I must say I have noticed this year that the people posting here have, in general, been more supportive than dismissive of each others style than in the past. I am noticing this in other WC forums sites to a degree as well. Moderators from some of the 'linage specific' sites for instance step in and say that this is not the place for politics.

    In this information rich climate, reputations can be quickly tarnished. Golgo mentioned the Bullshido web-site. They do participate in a heap of WC bashing there but they operate on a 'show me the proof' basis. And there in lies the rub, as Wu Wei Wu and Phil have pointed out.


    Because if your main concern focuses around wing chun history (or supposed history), the politics of lineage, ranks, and positions within and amoung families...

    you're contributing to the footnote syndrome I alluded to earlier.
    True also Victor.

    But forgive the museum professional in me, I want to understand the full Wing Chun picture, understand when techniques originated and why and see how they have evolved and diverged. I am not, however, interested in this so I can say that mine is better than yours, just understand why it is different. Unfortunately these type of forum discussions invariable deteriorate into linage bashing or ****ing contests (can I say that here?) making it very hard to learn. This is a shame as we have a diverse potential of human resources on this forum.

    Peter
    Last edited by Museumtech; 11-17-2008 at 03:24 AM. Reason: Changed lineage picture to Wing Chun picture.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Museumtech View Post
    ****ing contests (can I say that here?)
    Guess not.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    5,714
    Boxing is not flashy, neither is judo and certainly not BJJ.
    You haven't seen my new Keiko gi. and, the patches ...
    "Once you reject experience, and begin looking for the mysterious, then you are caught!" - Krishnamurti
    "We are all one" - Genki Sudo
    "We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion" - Tool, Parabol/Parabola
    "Bro, you f***ed up a long time ago" - Kurt Osiander

    WC Academy BJJ/MMA Academy Surviving Violent Crime TCM Info
    Don't like my posts? Challenge me!

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by anerlich View Post
    You haven't seen my new Keiko gi. and, the patches ...
    Wear it to class Wednesday the 3rd Dec. I hope to fly up and see Rick. I'll take a photo and post it here for adjudication.

  13. #13
    Oh no, Anerlich in his new gi... Please don't post a picture of that on this forum! The wing chun gods will freak out!

    As for this:

    "a) pressure test;
    b) adapt; and
    c) evolve."

    ***THAT is the key, alright.

    .......................................

    And it was followed by this:

    "There are those who cling onto the fabric of history claiming the art as being unbeatable and cite as their examples the mythical exploits of Gung Fu men from a bygone era."

    ***CONTRIBUTING to the footnote syndrome.

    ......................................

    And this:

    "And there are those who seek empirical verification and are only prepared to don Wing Chun armour that has been battle tested."

    ***AFTER 3+ decades in wing chun, I've become one of these people. No more time to waste on stuff that doesn't work.

    ....................................

    And this:

    "This issue is further compounded by the preservationists who complain that those who test, evolve and adapt, depart too far from the system for them to continue to call themselves Wing Chun men."

    ***AND these are the people who will lead the way into the land of HISTORICAL FOOTNOTES.
    Last edited by Ultimatewingchun; 11-15-2008 at 08:52 AM.

  14. #14
    I wrote the following earlier:

    Irrespective of functional modes of training, the downfall of Wing Chun will be the failure of Wing Chun men to;

    a) pressure test;
    b) adapt; and
    c) evolve.


    This particular debate isn't decrying the validity of historical accuracy. I am sure most people have no problem providing some kind of acknowledgment to the founders and the underlying traditions.

    The issue seems to be more one of preservation. There are those who cling onto the fabric of history claiming the art as being unbeatable and cite as their examples the mythical exploits of Gung Fu men from a bygone era.

    And there are those who seek empirical verification and are only prepared to don Wing Chun armour that has been battle tested.

    This issue is further compounded by the preservationists who complain that those who test, evolve and adapt, depart too far from the system for them to continue to call themselves Wing Chun men.


    Suki Gosal
    "From a psychological point of view, demons represent the universal equivalents of the dark, cruel, animal depths of the mind. When we as martial artists are preparing ourselves to overcome our fear of domination at the hands of an opponent, we must go deep within our inner being and allow the darkest parts of ourselves to be revealed. In order to battle the monsters in an abyss, we must sometimes unleash the demon within" http://darkwingchun.wordpress.com/

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Museumtech View Post
    ... into linage bashing or ****ing contests (can I say that here?) ...
    Pissing? Works for me .
    "If trolling is an art then I am your yoda.if spelling counts, go elsewhere.........." - BL

    "I don't do much cardio." - Ironfist

    "Grip training is everything. I say this with CoC in hand." - abobo

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •