Originally Posted by
Jimbo
I also like the longer takes, and also, nowadays, no matter how good a new martial arts film can be, they still lack the sheer variety of performers in the past. You had guys that did all manner of traditional styles, plus as mentioned, the Peking/Beijing Opera-trained performers. Also, a number of non-Chinese stylists, such as from karate and taekwondo, successfully made the transition into KF films. PLUS, you had guys who never had formal m.a. training who nonetheless could look good (Leung Kar-Yan, David Chiang, Lo Lieh, Hui Ying-Hung, etc.). Plus the variety of directors and choreographers compared to today.
Compare that to now. If it's "kung fu" at all, it's contemporary wushu. Final. And wushu all looks the same on screen after awhile, regardless southern, northern, internal/external, etc. And most of the choreographers, even old-school ones, have run out of ideas. Corey Yuen, Yuen Wo-Ping, etc. And now it's all wire-work and CGI. So the physical skill level on most contemporary m.a. films is not as complex. Donnie Yen right now is the best out there, followed by Tony Jaa and crew. But two guys and their crews can only carry the martial arts genre so far.
Also, IMO the period kung fu films hold up far, far better than even really good contemporary action/martial arts films. Watch a modern-day m.a. film from the mid-'70s/mid-'80s today, and lots of things that were supposed to be so cool now seem like dumb antiques, like the "futuristic," computerized lunch wagon in Meals on Wheels. Whereas, Chang Cheh's Shaolin series, for example, taking place in the Ching/Qing Dynasty, still seems relevant. Also, times past/ as in 150-400+ years ago, was more the era when m.a. would fit into such stories and make better sense.