Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 41

Thread: The Raw Shaolin Form

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sub. of Chicago - Downers Grove
    Posts
    6,772

    The Raw Shaolin Form

    Ok, since many Shaolin styles basically teach the same, or similar movements, what if we took ALL Shaolin forms and connected them back to back to back, and then deleted all the redundant techniques to create one single form that represents all of Shaolin's techniques in one set?

    How long would it be?
    Those that are the most sucessful are also the biggest failures. The difference between them and the rest of the failures is they keep getting up over and over again, until they finally succeed.


    For the Women:

    + = & a

  2. #2

    impossible

    id say as long as a piece of string

  3. #3
    why would you want to do that?
    all of these different systems have their own unique history and development.
    there is a lot more to a system than the techniques that you see in forms, just because two systems have outwardly "similar" moves, the power training and jibengong as preserved in those 2 systems might result in 2 very different interpretations.
    besides, there already is a standardized "Shaolin" form and it's not worth much IMO.
    Last edited by beiquan; 08-15-2006 at 11:04 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    styles emphasize strategy and tactics which define them as a style.
    Shaolin is a very broad and general term that covers a whole lot of styles.
    teh long, the short, the middle. Different jings and how to develop them and how to express them in whatever context. the gongs, the augmentation practices that prepare you for use of techniques and so on and so on.

    for people who study a system, it generally means following a method. That method will put emphasis on on what is known as workable within the context of what the master knows and what he will impart.

    so in short, it would be virtually impossible to gather all forms and delete out all the redundancies because redundancy is what makes for progressive learning and strengthening of attributes associated with style.

    anything worth having can't be rushed and when it is, it's not worth having.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Western MASS
    Posts
    4,820
    i think RD is tlaking about SOngshan shaolin. thats why he said raw. cause thats the "official" shaolin of today. and yes alot of their forms do look alike. I agree.
    Quote Originally Posted by Psycho Mantis View Post
    Genes too busy rocking the gang and scarfing down bags of cheetos while beating it to nacho ninjettes and laughing at the ridiculous posts on the kfforum. In a horse stance of course.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    405

    Hypothetical

    I could be wrong, but I think RD is curious as to how long we think a form that was assembled using each Shaolin technique one time would be. If I'm right, than this would be one seriously long form. I'd think it would take an hour or more to perform. If you could even remember all of it. I think SD already has a form like this. Sorry, I just couldn't help myself.

    As to redundancy within forms, I think it is how the person who created the form emphasized the techniques they felt were the most important for a student to learn. Repetition builds mental and muscle memory, as well as strength and coordination. JMO
    "Repugnant is a creature that would squander the ability to lift an eye to heaven, conscious of it's fleeting time here." - Tool

    www.bentmonk.com

  7. #7
    Greetings,

    This has been done.

    Bagua in my opinion is one of the remaining doors to the real Lohan technique. Instead of having hundreds of forms, there was a simplification to essential techniques that through the use of directional changes evolve into something greater than what the eye can initially see. Tan Tui is like that as well.


    mickey

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    48,177

    Is this a koan? If so, I like qixingmantis' reply. Here's mine:

    sit casting a shadow on a stone
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Western MASS
    Posts
    4,820
    Quote Originally Posted by GeneChing View Post
    sit casting a shadow on a stone

    always answering with your philosophical stuff no one understands.


    *edit
    except maybe jamieson cause he's a hippie canadian.
    Quote Originally Posted by Psycho Mantis View Post
    Genes too busy rocking the gang and scarfing down bags of cheetos while beating it to nacho ninjettes and laughing at the ridiculous posts on the kfforum. In a horse stance of course.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sub. of Chicago - Downers Grove
    Posts
    6,772
    My thought is that there is so *Much* redundancy, that a single form of all Shaolin, with all the redundancies removed might not be more than a few hundred techniques in length.
    Those that are the most sucessful are also the biggest failures. The difference between them and the rest of the failures is they keep getting up over and over again, until they finally succeed.


    For the Women:

    + = & a

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    what's not to get about koans?
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  12. #12
    You are referring to a compulsory set way (guiding taolu); didn't they tried that already?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    48,177

    *not* to get about koans

    But redundancy is good. Repetition, repetition, repetition. It's all the flowery stuff we can do without.

    For me, actually, it goes the other way. Rather than look at all the different forms, I'm more fascinated by the multitude of variation within a single form. Take Xiaohong. It's practiced so many different ways. There's so much variation of interpretation between individuals. Just last week, I saw Yanxing's version of Yinshougun and it had a totally different beginning than what I was taught. I think both versions are valid. My version fits me better but Yanxing's version is still interesting. So for me, it's not about distilling to some universal essentials. It's about the immense diversity. If you just want basics, look to Muay Thai. There's only a few moves really, and then it's just repetition, repetition, repetition.

    P.S. Shaolinlueb, that was a softball koan. Surely you can penetrate it with a little meditation.
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Western MASS
    Posts
    4,820
    i was talking about casting a stone. not the softball koan. the koan ill run over.


    p.s. isnt it cone?
    Quote Originally Posted by Psycho Mantis View Post
    Genes too busy rocking the gang and scarfing down bags of cheetos while beating it to nacho ninjettes and laughing at the ridiculous posts on the kfforum. In a horse stance of course.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    48,177

    haiku

    talking softball koans
    conical shaolin shadows
    an ill stoned cast
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •