Hmmm
I spent a small amount of time with one of Bruces senior students and all I can say is if the old Chinese idea of to get to know the Master one observes the quality of their disciples, then I would say give Kumar's stuff a wide berth.
However please feel free to ignore as I am a little biased as I don't care for Bruce Frantzis at all and his massive ego.
I do find that some of the claims of his lineage are a bit dubious, but I don't want to insult his masters, maybe just how he advertises his own lineage etc.
He is a bit of a bull****ter, and I've never met one of his students who has been able to tell the truth on why Wang Shu-jin kicked him out of his classes. I was told a few years ago by a reputable source and all the Kumarites I've spoken to refuse to validate it.
Im not saying Kumar is a charlatan, not at all his dose have some kudos for all the years he has been legitimately studying, but my point is I feel he always elevates himself to a position higher than what he really is.
His book on Internal Martial arts was in many ways a poor book. Knowing that he didn't tell the whole truth about one or two of his teachers in the past leaves the door of doubt open to all his other teachers.
I just feel the man has something, but not as much as others.
" Don't confuse yourself with someone who has something to say " - The Fall
" I do not like your tone/ It has ephemeral whingeing aspects " - The Fall
" There are twelve people in the world/ The rest are paste " - Mark E Smith